Release of OAI (Open Archives Initiative) Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE) User Guide and Specification Documents

The OAI Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE) User Guide and Specification documents have been released at http://openarchives.org/ore/toc. Feedback is sought on their contents, as part of our effort to transition these documents to beta and then final production release. A Google Group has been established to publicly discuss these documents: http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore.

You will also find this URL in the header note in the OAI-ORE documents.

Upcoming events related to OAI-ORE:

1. March 3rd 2008, John Hopkins University: USA ORE Open Meeting.
Register at http://www.regonline.com/oai-ore (limited to 150).
Supportedby Microsoft.

2. April 4th 2008, University of Southampton: European ORE Open Meeting.
In conjunction with Open Repositories 2008. Registration not yet available.
Supported by JISC.

Information provided by - Carl Lagoze & Herbert Van de Sompel on behalf of the OAI-ORE effort

Which comes first? The chicken and egg dilemma.

When it comes to repositories, there is a chicken and egg dilemma. Which comes first, the marketing or the content? In Florida, we've been told by institutions that they need sufficient content in order to market the repository to faculty and provide training. On the other hand, we need faculty to be aware of the repository in order to contribute content and URLs to expand the amount of high quality content. So, how have we handled this dilemma?

Our approach is to take multiple paths. First of all, we recognize that faculty are very busy and often must do what is easy and effective to impact students due to time constraints. So, the integration of our repository software system into the learning management system is a priority. Integration, the direct entry into a repository thru an LMS without additional authentication, makes access to and use of the repository simple, easy, and reduces training. Why? Faculty are accessing the repository using tools provided by the LMS that they are familiar with and have received training to use. The repository becomes one more tool in their LMS toolbox. The integration of the repository supports success of the project as well as becoming a marketing tool. Integration requires faculty to have only one login and password to the learning management system which also enables access to the repository.

We also recognize that without sufficient content, that there is no reason to use the repository. In order to increase the pool of resources, we are pursuing content acquisition from the following resource types:

1. State of Florida Resources. Contacted Florida entities and institutions, that have received money from the state to develop resources, and requested to place a copy of the resource in the repository. While there has been enthusiasm to share the resource/s, it has not been easy to acquire the content. And, there have been issues to effectively use the resources that were provided. Guidance is needed to inform developers regarding preferred methods of saving and storing content.
2. Institutional Developed resources
3. Faculty developed resources – individual contacts
4. Federation and Harvesting
5. Open Educational Resources www.oercommons.org
6. Publisher Content
7. URLs to exemplary resources identified by other repositories

Another effective path for marketing has been to offer both face to face training and online tutorials.